Adrian Williams
- Total activity 391
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 1 user
- Votes 1
- Subscriptions 148
Activity overview
Latest activity by Adrian Williams-
Adrian Williams commented,
The random module also provides a range of other number generators e.g. to provide uniform, gaussian and logarithmic distributions, see the Python documentation for the random module for details.
-
Adrian Williams commented,
Could you clarify what you mean whey you say they don't work? Here is an example of its use within the Generate Data node. And the corresponding output values: Attached files Generate_R...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
It is possible to compare the string values but you may want to convert the data type of the fields to 'date' type before performing the comparison - you can use the Modify Fields to perform the da...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
The base information for the warning message is contained in the node log file for the Lookup node. The node log files are stored in a sub-directory of the Analyze instance's site directory at: sit...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
Hi Nick, you can use a Sort node to sort the data on the field containing your date values. Then within a Transform node configure the 'GroupBy' property with the field you used to sort the data. T...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
You may also be interested in viewing the Python cheat sheet article: https://support.infogix.com/hc/en-us/articles/360037751033-Python-Cheat-Sheet
-
Adrian Williams commented,
The Analyze nodes that utilize the Python language for scripting leverage Jython which is a Java implementation of the Python 2 language specification. The Jython implementation shipped with Analyz...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
Yes you can access property values within your code. See the following topic in the Help documentation of your system: 'Advanced topics' > 'Using derived property values' The corresponding document...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
I don't think a root cause was identified for this error. I understand re-building the logic in a new data flow worked and the issue has not re-appeared. Does this issue just affect one data flow?...
-
Adrian Williams commented,
I also had an error in the initialization of the msg variable: it is now the value of the field rather than the field name